Back to blogTechnical
JavaScript SEO in 2026: What Still Matters
SSR vs. SSG vs. ISR — what Google actually renders, and what you can skip.
SEOKit24 Editorial12 min read
JavaScript SEO matured in 2024–2026. SSR vs SSG vs ISR is no longer a debate — each has its place. Here’s the framework.
What Google actually renders
Google’s second-wave renderer (deferred queue) executes JavaScript and re-indexes the rendered HTML. It is reliable. It is also slow — second-wave indexing can take days to weeks.
When to use SSR
- Content changes on every request (search results, dashboards).
- User-specific content.
- Freshness-sensitive content where first-wave indexing matters.
When to use SSG
- Marketing pages, blog posts, docs.
- Anything with a stable URL and infrequent changes.
- Anything where build-time HTML is fine.
When to use ISR
- Ecommerce product pages (price/availability change frequently).
- News articles (publish-time HTML, decay-managed revalidation).
- Large catalogs where SSR is too expensive.
The audit
- Disable JavaScript in DevTools.
- View source. Is your primary content present?
- Enable JavaScript. Wait 5 seconds.
- View again. Same content?
- If yes to #2: you’re fine.
- If yes to #4 but no to #2: you’re on second-wave indexing. Decide if that’s acceptable.
What doesn’t matter
The framework. Next.js, Astro, SvelteKit, Nuxt — they all ship acceptable JS SEO when configured correctly. The variable is the rendering strategy, not the framework.